Fashion News

Fashion from all over the world

Archive for November, 2008

Wearing a traditional Peruvian poncho, President George W. Bush gestures as Japan’s Prime Minister Taro Aso stands below before the official group photo of the 16th summit of the Asian Pacific Economic Cooperation, APEC, in Lima.

  • 1 Comment
  • Filed under: Pictures
  • CHICAGO (AP) — Pushing the calendar, and maybe his luck, President-elect Barack Obama is urging rapid approval of a massive economic stimulus package meant to calm turbulent financial markets.

    He will not be president for another eight weeks, and the politically safer route might be to lie low as President George W. Bush finishes his rocky term. But in announcing his economic team Monday at a White House-style news conference, Obama has chosen to use the bully pulpit even before he assumes the office, gambling that he can soften the economy’s fall while he continues to fill out the rest of his cabinet.

    “The truth is, we do not have a minute to waste. These extraordinary stresses on our financial system require extraordinary policy responses,” Obama said, introducing New York Federal Reserve Bank president Timothy Geithner as his treasury secretary and Lawrence Summers, a former treasury secretary under President Bill Clinton, to lead the National Economic Council.

    Obama has said repeatedly there can be only one president at a time, and has kept a relatively low public profile as Bush and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson have tried to address the mortgage and credit crisis that threaten a deep global recession. That changed at his news conference Monday, when the president-elect pressed for passage of a multibillion-dollar stimulus plan aimed at creating jobs, easing the home foreclosure crisis and rescuing the struggling auto industry.

    Doug Astolfi, a presidential historian at Florida’s St. Leo University, said that because of the recent stock market plunge Obama had little choice but to step forward.

    “Had he not gotten involved, the potential for really disastrous shifts in the economy were all there,” Astolfi said, adding that until his inauguration Obama is still insulated from blame if things get worse.

    “He can key in a team and push for policies. But if bad things happen he’s protected from most criticism because it’s the fault of the people who are still there,” Astolfi said.

    To be sure, Obama refused to specify how much the proposal would cost or how he would pay for it, even as Democratic allies in Congress have predicted a price tag of as much as $700 billion. “It’s going to be costly,” he warned, noting that both conservative and liberal economists agree on the need for such unprecedented intervention.

    Obama planned another news conference Tuesday to introduce Peter Orszag, the Congressional Budget Office director and the president-elect’s pick to be his budget director. He also was set to outline what he described as “meaningful cuts and sacrifices” to help ease the financial crunch.

    By stepping out so forcefully, Obama signaled he was not following the example of another Democratic president, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who was elected in 1932 during another period of economic calamity. Roosevelt refused to cooperate during the transition with his vanquished predecessor, Republican Herbert Hoover, waiting instead to tackle the crisis after he was sworn in as president.

    Obama said Monday he had spoken to Bush and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke about the proposed government bailout of Citigroup Inc.

    “My commitment is to do what’s required so that our financial system works and credit flows. President Bush has indicated that he has the same approach, the same attitude,” Obama said.

    But Obama stepped symbolically away from Bush as well, stressing repeatedly that his stimulus plan was aimed at middle-class wage earners, not just big financial institutions. It was an implicit reminder that many of Bush’s economic policies have favored the wealthy.

    “We cannot have a thriving Wall Street without a thriving Main Street, that in this country we rise or fall as one nation, as one people,” Obama said, promising to make good on his pledge to bring tax relief to families earning less than $250,000 a year.

    Obama also used Monday’s news conference to lob a warning at the Big Three automakers — and indirectly their powerful union, the United Auto Workers — who have pressed Congress for $25 billion in government loans to wrest them from the brink of bankruptcy.

    Obama has urged help for the auto industry but cautioned that Ford Motor Co., Chrysler LLC and General Motors Corp. must do a better job of explaining how they plan to reform their business practices.

    “We can’t just write a blank check to the auto industry. Taxpayers can’t be expected to pony up more money for an auto industry that has been resistant to change,” he said.

    Jack Pitney, a government professor at California’s Claremont McKenna College, said Obama was showing “equal parts assertiveness and reassurance” by his decision to step forward.

    “He’s not trying to usurp the president’s authority,” Pitney said, “but he’s trying to prepare the groundwork for the moment he takes the oath.”

  • 0 Comments
  • Filed under: Pictures
  • Clinton campaigns for Obama

    Clinton put to rest rest rumors that she was bitter after her primary loss by campaigning vigorously for Obama in the month leading up to the election.
    She could face tough Senate confirmation hearings if Obama chooses her. Gov. Bill Richardson and Sen. John F. Kerry are reportedly also in the running.
    Reporting from Washington — Hillary Rodham Clinton emerged Friday as a top contender to be secretary of State after flying to Chicago the day before and meeting privately with President-elect Barack Obama, former advisors to the senator from New York said.

    Obama is weighing other prominent elected officials for the post of the nation’s top diplomat, but has zeroed in on the former first lady and runner-up for the Democratic presidential nomination, according to one of her campaign aides.

    Many of Clinton’s allies would like her to take the job, even though it would mean giving up her independent power base in the Senate. “She could weld this world together,” said Susie Tompkins Buell, a Clinton donor and friend. “I think it would be amazing.”

    Since losing the hard-fought primary to Obama, Clinton has been on his radar. She made Obama’s short list for vice president, but lost out to Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware.

    Having passed over Clinton once, Obama would be hard-pressed to do it again by dangling the secretary of State’s job and then giving it to someone else, members of Clinton’s circle said.

    “Having trifled with her on the vice presidency, it seems unlikely he’s going to trifle with her on this,” said one former Clinton advisor, who like other Clinton associates requested anonymity to be able to speak more openly.

    Clinton’s Senate office referred questions to the Obama transition headquarters. “Any speculation about Cabinet or other administration appointments is really for President-elect Obama’s transition team to address,” said Philippe Reines, a Clinton spokesman.

    Obama’s office declined to comment.

    Former President Clinton’s staff also would not comment, except to say that he had not been making phone calls to push for his wife’s nomination.

    Other candidates for secretary of State include Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.), the party’s 2004 presidential nominee; and New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, who met Friday with Obama, a Democratic official said.

    Obama is running a closed-mouthed transition operation, so it is difficult to assess the seriousness of Clinton’s chances. Obama’s team could be floating the prospect as a trial balloon to gauge public reaction. Or Clinton’s allies may be talking up the possibility in hopes of influencing public opinion and improving her chances.

    One thing is clear: Obama has done nothing to bat down speculation that Clinton may take one of the premier Cabinet posts in his administration.

    Clinton’s foreign policy bona fides were a running theme during the primaries.

    She tried to make foreign affairs a selling point, repeatedly telling crowds that as first lady she had visited more than 80 countries. But she occasionally overreached. Clinton was forced to backtrack after claiming she had to evade sniper fire when landing in Bosnia-Herzegovina in 1996. Archival footage showed a peaceful arrival, not the harrowing scene she described.

    During a conference call with reporters in February, her aides were asked to name a single foreign policy crisis in which she was tested. There was a lengthy pause. A reply offered by one aide seemed beside the point: She had been endorsed by more than two dozen high-ranking military officers.

    Were Obama to choose her, Clinton might face tough questions during Senate confirmation hearings. Her husband has raised millions of dollars overseas for his presidential library. The Saudi royal family was reportedly among the contributors.

    The Clintons’ refusal to make public the names of donors dogged Sen. Clinton’s presidential campaign. Obama aides pressed her to release the names of all donors to her husband’s library and charitable foundation.

    David Plouffe, as Obama’s campaign manager, had once called Sen. Clinton “one of the most secretive politicians in America today.”

    Her husband’s associations could also face renewed scrutiny.

    In recent years, his charitable foundation received $31 million from Frank Giustra, a Canadian mining businessman, the New York Times reported. Months earlier, the former president accompanied Giustra on a trip to Kazakhstan, where Clinton touted an effort by the country’s leader to head an international pro-democracy group. That position was at odds with U.S. policy on Kazakhstan’s human rights record. Giustra’s company later signed deals for uranium projects in Kazakhstan.

    Sen. Clinton’s allies said that her husband’s work should not be a barrier.

    Lanny J. Davis, a longtime friend of the family, said of President Clinton: “He has no business interests; that’s a complete myth.” Davis added that the former president’s efforts “raising money for AIDS” prevention and tsunami relief should not be grounds for concern.

    Sen. Clinton spoke Friday at a conference on public transit in Albany, N.Y. She joked about reports of her travel to Chicago. “I have to start by saying I’m very happy there is so much press attention and interest in transit, especially guesses about my own . . . ” she said to laughter. “Let me just say that I’m not going to speculate or address anything about the president-elect’s incoming administration. And I’m going to respect his process.”

    As a defeated candidate for president, Clinton has several paths open to her. One model is Massachusetts Sen. Edward M. Kennedy. After he lost the Democratic nomination to Jimmy Carter in 1980, Kennedy focused on passing major legislation, and compiled a formidable record.

    Yet on one of her signature issues — healthcare — Clinton may already have been upstaged. Legislative colleagues, including Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.), already have come out with detailed healthcare overhauls.

    By trading in her Senate job for secretary of State, Clinton would command a global stage. She could use the position to take up causes that have long been important to her: Middle East peace, a resolution to the Iraq war, and international respect for women’s rights.

    But she would also face internal competition for control of Obama’s foreign policy portfolio. Biden, who is chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, considers foreign affairs to be a specialty and will undoubtedly want a strong hand in shaping the nation’s diplomatic strategy.

    Still, Clinton’s friends believe the job would be a good fit.

    Davis said: “There’s no question in my mind that the combination of Barack Obama as president and Hillary Clinton — who is a great listener and has the rare ability to walk in other people’s shoes and see the world through their eyes — would make a dramatic impact in international relations.”

  • 0 Comments
  • Filed under: Uncategorized
  • A Palestinian smuggler moves a goat through a tunnel from Egypt to the Gaza Strip under the border in Rafah, southern Gaza Strip, Friday, Nov. 14, 2008. Israel kept the crossings into Gaza sealed for a tenth straight day Friday in response to continued rocket fire by Palestinian militants that followed an Israeli army raid
  • 0 Comments
  • Filed under: Pictures
  •  

     

    Pic: PA Photos

    Singer says she’s ’saddened’ after apparent suicide near her home
    Singer and ‘American Idol’ judge Paula Abdul has said she is “shocked and saddened” after discovering a fan was found dead near her home. 

    Los Angeles Police believe thatPaula Goodspeed died of “suicide by overdose” after the 30 year-old’s body was discovered in a car parked near the singer’s home.

    It is understood CDs and pictures ofAbdul were in the vehicle, whileGoodspeed auditioned in front of the singer and her fellow judges during the fifth series of ‘American Idol’, reports BBC News.

    In a statement Abdul said: “I am deeply shocked and saddened at what transpired yesterday. My heart and prayers go out to her family.” 

    An official cause of death has yet to be determined.

  • 0 Comments
  • Filed under: Entertainment
  • President-elect Obama answers questions during a news conference in Chicago.
    (President-elect Obama answers questions during a news conference in Chicago.)
    As hard as his opponents tried to rattle Barack Obama during the presidential campaign, even their most blustery attacks usually left him cool, considered and respectful. Now Obama is testing out the same calm treatment on America’s adversaries abroad, offering a first glimpse of how the young President may carry himself on the international stage. But even if Obama’s temperament can warm the diplomatic atmosphere, will it help resolve America’s toughest issues abroad?

    The question has been put to an early test: The day after Obama’s election, Russian President Dmitri Medvedev publicly threatened to deploy missiles near the borders of two NATO allies to counter the Bush administration’s plans to install anti-missile systems in Poland and the Czech Republic. The Russian announcement, rolled out during an elaborate ceremony, was timed to put one of the most contentious issues between Moscow and Washington on Obama’s table right away. Obama and his advisers took it as an intentional provocation aimed at testing the President-elect.

    Despite the bashing they had received in the campaign from John McCain for being soft on Russia, Obama and his advisers decided not to push back against Medvedev. They issued no statement on the Medvedev announcement, on the record or on background. Instead, Obama politely returned Medvedev’s congratulatory Nov. 8 phone call and laid out for his Russian counterpart his own view of the U.S.-Russia agenda. Aides say Obama and Medvedev discussed substantive issues on the call, but missile defense didn’t come up. The Russian President responded positively to Obama’s understated reaction. “The Russians were very congratulatory, so it was a good and productive call,” says one Obama aide. (See pictures of the world reacting to Obama’s win.)

    So was the calm response to Russia’s missile gambit a success? Obama’s aides present it as a sober counterpart to McCain’s tough talk during the campaign. “What was overlooked in [Medvedev's] speech was a part about working cooperatively on issues of common concern,” says the aide. “So the transition [team] seized upon that issue up front.” Such tactics, however, have not pleased some on the hawkish right, who fear that Obama is appeasing the Russians. Daniel Henninger of the Wall Street Journal editorial board called on Obama to say “publicly and explicitly [that he] will not be intimidated by actions like this.”

    In fact, Obama’s biggest challenge lies not in the tone he takes with the Russians, but in the substantial policy choices he makes. While Medvedev may in part have been testing whether he can fluster Obama, he’s more interested in probing the Democrat’s ambiguous position on missile defense. And in that regard, Obama faced another test almost immediately after the Medvedev phone call.

    Obama had returned the congratulatory call of Polish President Lech Kaczynski the same day, and had discussed the U.S.-Polish alliance. The day after that call, Nov. 9, Kaczynski released a statement claiming that Obama had promised “that the [U.S.] missile defense project would continue.”

    That presented the Obama team with a second dilemma. Poland is an important ally, with over 1,000 troops in Afghanistan. On the other hand, Kaczynski was breaking with protocol by releasing details of the private call. What’s more, aides say, he was mischaracterizing what Obama had said.

    Denis McDonough, a top Obama aide, released a statement saying that during the call the President-elect had not endorsed the anti-missile deployment but had simply repeated his strategically ambiguous position from the campaign. “[Obama] supports deploying a missile defense system when the technology is proved to be workable,” McDonough said. In an apparent attempt to soften Poland’s embarrassment at being publicly contradicted, Obama had Vice President-elect Joe Biden quietly follow up with a call to Polish President Kaczynski Monday, aides say.

    The Russians, however, now think they may be able to back Obama away from the Bush administration’s commitment to deploy the missile defense systems to Poland and Czech Republic. Wednesday the three main Russian news agencies quoted an unnamed Kremlin source as rejecting the latest efforts by the Bush Administration to assuage Moscow’s fears and suspending talks with Washington on the issue. “We will not give our agreement to these proposals,” the source is quoted as saying, “and we will speak to the new Administration.”

    So did Obama’s non-confrontational response impede progress on resolving the dispute with Moscow over missile defense? Probably not. Given the Democrat’s ambiguous position on the issue, Russia is unlikely to accept any U.S. deal offered in the interregnum after his election. Yet Obama’s “no drama” reaction at least avoided confrontation and bought him some time to pull together a foreign policy team and decide where he really stands on the deployment of missile defense to Europe. As former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage used to say, “Diplomacy is the art of saying ‘nice doggie’ while looking for a stick.”

  • 0 Comments
  • Filed under: Uncategorized